Search for: "Claiborne v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
The case involving a claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act is Sprint/United Management v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:27 am by Eugene Volokh
That’s the so-called “solicitation” exception, most clearly set forth in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 8:34 am
United States, No. 06-5618, due to petitioner's death. [read post]
15 May 2007, 6:56 am
The applicable United States Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of between 210 and 262 months of imprisonment, but the district court imposed a sentence of only 72 months. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:20 pm
At Sentencing Law and Policy, Doug Berman has this post discussing the recent Sixth Circuit Valentine opinion, a vehicle for the High Court to address Booker retroactivity issues; and this post discussing whether the Court should remand Claiborne given the United States Sentencing Committee's new Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy report. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm by Richard Renner
In its noblest work, it seeks to make the law of the 50 united states more uniform by “restating” the law in a cogent organized work. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 6:32 am by Robin Craig
Notably, both sets of amici — the United States and three water law professors — agreed with the defendants. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
The court’s landmark decision in NAACP v Claiborne Hardware Co. affirmed the constitutional right of NAACP activists to hold a mass economic boycott of white-owned businesses in Port Gibson, Mississippi, to protest the community’s persistent racial inequality and segregation. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
  And such laws cannot survive even the less stringent standard of review articulated in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
  There is a lot in Pickett that merits highlighting, but this paragraph may be my favorite and the most important aspect of the decision (and not just for crack cases, but for all cases):While Booker and § 3553(a) instruct sentencing courts to consider all these "multiple and vague" factors, United States v. [read post]