Search for: "Clarence Ross"
Results 41 - 60
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Ross, the Supreme Court rejected a challenge by a pork industry trade group to California’s Proposition 12—which bars in-state sale of pork unless the pigs whose slaughtered bodies produced that pork were raised in accordance with the state’s minimum standards for humane treatment of the slaughtered pigs themselves and the sows who birthed and suckled them as piglets. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal How Judges Navigate Offers of Free Lunch, Trips and NBA Tickets Bloomberg Law – Zoe Tillman (Bloomberg News) | Published: 6/25/2023 Recent controversies over perks accepted by Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito have raised questions not only about the justices’ conduct off the bench and what they disclose to the public, but also about how the judiciary broadly enforces ethics. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 9:09 am
For that, we look to Ross Guberman, the Legal Writing Pro: [H]ere’s where some well-known authorities stand: 1. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 8:38 am
The last movie I saw: Glengarry Glen Ross. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:06 am
Some critics have scoffed at Roberts’s census ruling, hoping along with Justice Clarence Thomas in his dissent that it is “a ticket good for this day and this train only. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 9:54 am
Both Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas in partial dissent are unclear on this question. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am
After considering various options, Ross decided to add a citizenship question back into the census. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:18 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas says yes, and Evan Bernick of the Center for Judicial Engagement heartily agrees. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:59 am
count superseding indictment, returned on June 7, and unsealed today, names 19 defendants: Harold Bacon, Andre Allen, Marcus Allen, Clayton Bonner, Samuel Crawford, Dawn Freeman, Kalan Jones, Denorris Mahone, III, Clarence Thompson, Richard Wagner, Gregory Washington, Eric Bosh, Danielle Krawchick, Sirblue Martin, Dorian Owens, Eugene Ralph, Kevin Richardson, Duane Scott, and Deian Wofford. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:10 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissents this Term. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 7:43 am
I had the opportunity to meet my fellow classmates, Kim Ross-Winston of Hughes & Luce (now K&L Gates) and Clarence Robertson of Jackson Walker in DALL. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
” At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel suggests that the omission of any mention of Chevron v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
” Commentary comes from Ross Runkel at his eponymous blog. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:05 am
Shelley Ross Saxer of Pepperdine University, a leading property law scholar. [read post]
Justices add three new cases, including challenge to animal-welfare law and Warhol copyright dispute
28 Mar 2022, 10:49 am
Justice Samuel Alito wrote a statement regarding the court’s decision not to take up the case, which was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel observes that “[p]erhaps the most important takeaway from this decision is the point that the Court rejects the principle that that FLSA exemptions should be construed narrowly. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:59 am
count superseding indictment, returned on June 7, and unsealed today, names 19 defendants: Harold Bacon, Andre Allen, Marcus Allen, Clayton Bonner, Samuel Crawford, Dawn Freeman, Kalan Jones, Denorris Mahone, III, Clarence Thompson, Richard Wagner, Gregory Washington, Eric Bosh, Danielle Krawchick, Sirblue Martin, Dorian Owens, Eugene Ralph, Kevin Richardson, Duane Scott, and Deian Wofford. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie observes that “if a prediction in Justice Clarence Thomas’s partial dissent proves accurate, caveats in the majority opinion may seriously undermine the ostensible liberal victory. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:35 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas 1. ? [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:39 am
This is just a flavor of the hypotheticals that the justices posed to Kedem and Erica Ross, who argued on behalf of the government, in what made for a lively argument. [read post]
