Search for: "Clark v. Mark"
Results 41 - 60
of 783
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2013, 2:23 am
Clark International, Limited v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:20 am
Clark International v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT MARK S. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 9:34 pm
" by Irish scholar, sage and legal consultant Robert Clark;* A note on the new US trade mark dilution statute by John L. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Clark (1871) that are no longer good law. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 1:47 pm
Texas Data v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
Starting today in the Supreme Court is the two day appeal of Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd, listed to be heard by Lords Walker, Clarke, Sumption, Reed, and Carnwath. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 1:21 am
Clark International Limited v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 10:29 pm
Candela v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
In view of the limited nature of the permitted disclosure and the other matters properly considered by the judge, it cannot be said that, in relation to this issue, he “erred in principle or reached a conclusion which was plainly wrong”, that being the test to be applied on appeal: Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] QB 103, [2007] EWCA Civ 295, at paragraph 45 (per Sir Anthony Clarke MR). [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 12:05 pm
Last Thursday, The Federalist Society hosted a debate about the Second Amendment with Professor Mark Tushnet, author of Out of Range: Why the Constitution Can't End the Battle Over Guns and Clark Neily, plaintiffs' counsel in Parker v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Jadebay: something you may not know about Amazon listings, but probably shouldJadebay v Clarke-Coles (t/a Feel Good UK) [2017] EWHC 1400 (IPEC) (June 2017)Feel Good listed their flagpole products in a way which made them look like Jadebay’s “Design Elements” flagpoles. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 2:02 pm
The Nevada Supreme Court has upheld an earlier ruling in Bahena v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Court of Appeal finds no reason to swipe right in MATCH v MUZMATCH online dating disputeMatch Group, LLC v Muzmatch Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (April 2023)“MATCH” is hardly a distinctive trade mark for an online dating, aka matchmaking, service. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:49 am
Now here's a little surprise, delivered by the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lord Clarke, Master of the Rolls, Lords Justices Rix and Lloyd) yesterday in Honda Giken KKK v KJM Superbikes Ltd. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:08 am
In doing so the BGH rather restrictively applies the CJEU reasoning in its recent decision in Nintendo Co Ltd v BigBen Interactive GmbH (C-25/16) of 27 September 2017 [here], which was handed down in the context of registered community designs to trade marks. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
(Gömböc Kutató v Szellemi Tulajdon, Court of Justice of the EU, Case C‑237/19 (April 2020))While shape trade marks comprise less than 0.5% of all EU trade marks applied for ever, us trade mark lawyers do enjoy talking about them an awful lot. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:30 pm
Neal Solomon: The Transformation Of The American Patent System Ephrat Livni: Do Cake Designs Count As Intellectual Property Walter Olson: TC Heartland v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:35 am
Gilead claimed that Pharmasset Barbados was the successor in title to Mr Clark the inventor, and thus able validly to claim priority under the Paris Convention, by virtue of the employment contract of Mr Clark, and an agreement between the two Pharmasset companies. [read post]
