Search for: "Clark v. Owens" Results 41 - 60 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2012, 12:49 am by Sam Murrant
The debate has also sparked more commentary in the Guardian – Shami Chakrabarti wrote an article reiterating the by now familiar arguments against the Government’s proposals (and pointing out their general unpopularity with, it seems, everyone except Ken Clarke). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
On the same day Tugendhat J heard an application for permission to amend in the case of Modi v Clarke. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
On 13 March, Julian Huppert MP asked the justice secretary Kenneth Clarke about protection for academics and scientists in its draft defamation bill. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am by Sam Murrant
This Guardian article by Owen Bowcott offers a helpful summary of the main points, as the guidance itself is quite extensive. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The High Court ruled that the BBC could film and broadcast an interview with Babar Ahmad, a terrorism suspect who has been detained in the UK without a trial for seven years, after the justice secretary Kenneth Clarke refused permission. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 8:23 am
Clarke (D-NY) on 11/01/11 Amends the INA with respect to V visa (spouses/children of LPR who come to the United States to wait for completion of immigrant visa process) nonimmigrants to include certain Haitian nationals whose petition for a family-sponsored immigrant visa was approved on or before January 12, 2010. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:57 am by Anita Davies
But Mr Justice Owen allowed a negligence claim brought on behalf of one soldier’s child to go ahead. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
In Courtroom 1, Gale and another v Serious Organised Crime Agency is to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Judge, Clarke, Dyson and Reed. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Clark, John Owen Haley.New Providence, N.J. : LexisNexis, c2010. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Gibson, Matrix.
It will be for the seven Justices (Lords Phillips, Hope, Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown and Clarke, and Sir John Dyson SCJ) hearing the appeals in these two parallel cases finally to determine the relationship of the Upper Tribunal to the courts in England and in Scotland respectively and, thus, whether the English and Scottish stories shall share the same ending. [read post]