Search for: "Coalition for Responsible Wast v. EPA" Results 41 - 59 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Under EPCRA, companies must also report both routine and accidental releases of toxic chemicals, as well as the maximum amount of any listed chemicals at the facility and the amount contained in wastes transferred off-site. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
The $132,000 penalty was ordered after inspectors found problems with the way Spirit transported waste, the way the company stored and disposed of hazardous waste and failing to provide documented hazardous waste training for employees. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The company also failed to implement spill response plans, document spills and properly train employees for handling the material. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
Under RCRA, EPA regulates hazardous waste from production to final disposal. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
For the alleged Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) violation for failure to immediately notify the National Response Center of the chlorine release, Norfolk Southern will pay a penalty of $32,500, to be deposited in the Hazardous Substance Superfund. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
The Agency’s response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at the U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 5:06 pm by Steven M. Taber
Chamber of Commerce, 13 House lawmakers and the Southeastern Legal Foundation, and the Coalition for Responsible Regulation (E&ENews PM, Feb. 16). [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The Agency’s response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at: U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm by WIMS
EPA published the Endangerment Finding in response to the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
Kevin Conrad, executive director of the Coalition for Rainforest Nations and a special envoy for Papua New Guinea, said in an interview that while Obama has improved the rhetoric, “when you look at what they’re proposing, it’s absolutely unimpressive. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
EPA News Release, October 29, 2009 Tempe, Ariz., developer Lennar Communities Development, Inc., has settled with the Environmental Protection Agency for a total of $182,519 – a combined $38,425 fine and $144,094 supplemental environmental project – in response to alleged dust violations that occurred at residential construction sites in Maricopa County. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]