Search for: "Coca v. People"
Results 41 - 60
of 207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2019, 7:52 am
Kathleen Sullivan for Coca Cola said that consumers weren’t so unintelligent not to recognize the blend; Kennedy says “I thought that this was pomegranate juice. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
Look at expected uses v. unexpected uses? [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm
TM law says that if people think both would produce, then they’re in the same market. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:42 pm
Privacy protections can help people hide identity of registration. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:09 am
Honda has vigorously denied that it is liable and has announced that it will be appealing Milburn v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 8:18 am
Geffner v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 9:36 pm
The Supreme Court explained this enforcement rationale in its POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Jones v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
After federal courts blocked as unconstitutional Trump’s ban on transgender people serving in the military, and following a memorandum and report submitted by the defense secretary, Trump revoked that memorandum. [read post]
19 May 2018, 3:46 pm
Hayes v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:49 am
New People’s Bank, Inc., 1:17CV00044, 2018 WL 1659482, at *2 (W.D. [read post]
1 May 2018, 10:24 am
Google, CJ Products v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 11:34 am
We also note the treatment by the Canadian Trademark Opposition Board, confirmed on Appeal (see, for example, Cheung's Bakery Products Ltd v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:52 pm
"); Power Test Petroleum Distr., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am
The purpose of imposing this 3-cents-an-ounce sugar-sweetened beverage tax is to allow people to get their kids educated and move them out of poverty into taxpaying citizens.[4] Consistent with this revenue-centric approach, diet beverages were included in the tax to try to maximize its revenue potential, despite not contributing to caloric intake. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 9:19 am
Bibby v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 5:22 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
Elliott's claim are undeniable - people do actually use the verb “to google”. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:47 am
“Nope,” said the Ninth Circuit in the recent case of Elliott v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:47 am
“Nope,” said the Ninth Circuit in the recent case of Elliott v. [read post]