Search for: "Collins v. State of Texas"
Results 41 - 60
of 332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2021, 11:03 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Collins v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:32 am
Damages in condemnation cases State of Texas v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 10:59 am
Because Texas’ Second District Court of Appeals misapplied the Supreme Court of Texas’ holding in Perry Homes v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:24 pm
The following 4 Texas State cases explain in further detail that a person being investigated for DWI does not automatically have a right to counsel McCambridge v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:55 am
State, 634 S.W.2d 707, 709 (Tex.Crim.App.1982); Collins v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 11:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
In Collins v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:53 pm
TAM TRUST; from Collin County;5th district (05-06-00356-CV, 235 SW3d 819, 07-31-07). [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:16 am
Facts: This case (Collins v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:43 am
Supreme Court to brief and argue Collins v. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 6:50 am
In Texas v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:18 am
The Holland v. [read post]
29 May 2021, 5:25 pm
” Ganung v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:26 am
See, e.g., Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 9:19 am
Collins v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 12:50 am
," Aug. 4):Collin County, fed up with soaring court costs, has become the toughest county in Texas for criminal defendants seeking court-appointed lawyers to defend them.Some legal experts say the new county-imposed limits on a defendant's income and assets raise questions about the quality of justice in Collin County, one of the state's wealthiest suburban enclaves.The new rules also set Collin apart from Dallas and other Texas… [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:22 pm
State. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
STATE OF TEXAS; from Bexar County; 7th district (07-07-00274-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-28-07)08-0058 TAMMY ELKINS v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:32 am
Texas. [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
May 15, 2009)(per curiam) (condemnation, uncompensable losses, lost revenue testimony should not have been admitted)THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
