Search for: "Colorado Anti-Discrimination Commission v. Case"
Results 41 - 60
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2017, 1:23 pm
In state appeals court, the judges sided with the Colorado Rights Commission, agreeing that the business violated the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (or CADA) and it ordered the business to create same-sex marriage wedding cakes if it also created other wedding cakes. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 am
In state appeals court, the judges sided with the Colorado Rights Commission, agreeing that the business violated the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (or CADA) and it ordered the business to create same-sex marriage wedding cakes if it also created other wedding cakes. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
” Significantly, the court cited an earlier case, Newman v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
Although Colorado had not yet attempted to enforce its anti-discrimination statute against Smith's wedding website business—how could it, given that she didn't have a wedding website business? [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 6:52 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, basing its decision on some anti-religion comments made by the state agency that initially heard the discrimination complaint. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 7:40 am
In truth, it will be hard for the court's liberals not to join such an opinion, given their own anti-bias jurisprudence, especially in cases like Trump v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 4:05 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission: Application of the Outward Facing Actions Test to LGBTQ Nondiscrimination Provisions, (Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion, Forthcoming).Rafael Domingo & John Witte, Christianity and Global Law: Introduction,(October 10, 2019).Brenda Bauges, Balancing Religious Liberties and Anti-Discrimination Interests in the Public Employment Context: The Impact of Masterpiece Cakeshop and American Legion, (54 U. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:29 am
Supreme Court today in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
" The Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act prohibits all "public accommodations"—defined "broadly to include almost every public-facing business in the State"—from "denying the full and equal enjoyment of its goods and services to any customer based on his race, creed, disability, sexual orientation, or other statutorily enumerated trait. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 12:21 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:15 pm
The bakery, backed by the Trump administration, had claimed that freedom of religion or freedom of speech should give it a blank check to violate Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act and turn away same-sex couples. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:06 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission. *** Read more… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:45 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
The couple complained to the Colorado Commission in 2012 arguing that the baker had violated public accommodation law by discriminating against them on the basis of their sexual orientation under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
The couple complained to the Colorado Commission in 2012 arguing that the baker had violated public accommodation law by discriminating against them on the basis of their sexual orientation under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 4:25 am
In June this year the US Supreme Court handed down judgment in Masterpiece Cakeshop v Colorado Civil Rights Commission ruling 7:2 in favour of a Colorado baker who refused to make a bespoke wedding cake for a gay couple for religious reasons. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:55 pm
In rendering its decision in favor of baker Phillips SCOTUS found significant: a) Phillips’ refusal to bake the couple their cake occurred in 2012, before Obergefell was decided, and before the state of Colorado recognized same-sex marriage; b) the Commission in 2012 had a practice of finding no violations of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act in cases where the bakers had refused to create cakes with derogatory messages that demeaned… [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:55 pm
In rendering its decision in favor of baker Phillips SCOTUS found significant: a) Phillips’ refusal to bake the couple their cake occurred in 2012, before Obergefell was decided, and before the state of Colorado recognized same-sex marriage; b) the Commission in 2012 had a practice of finding no violations of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act in cases where the bakers had refused to create cakes with derogatory messages that demeaned… [read post]
