Search for: "Com. v. Crawford, S." Results 41 - 60 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2008, 11:49 am
  When he returns to Crawford in another 40 days, he’s going to find the state far different, at least in that dubious context. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am by Russ Bensing
Bryant (discussed here), in which the Court had substantially narrowed the confrontation right defined by Scalia’s opinion in Crawford v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
   Crager had held that lab results weren’t “testimonial” within the meaning of Crawford v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Virginia, which was to further explore the ramifications of the Court’s decision at the end of the 2008 term in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
  The court reverses an 8th District decision to the contrary, but notes that the 8th District had decided a case the previous year, Crawford v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  Remember, just because a statement falls within a hearsay exception doesn’t mean it survives a Crawford analysis, and just because it’s an excited utterance doesn’t mean it falls within the “emergency” analysis in post-Crawford decisions… Good decision from the 9th in State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
The picture was preferable to the 8th’s decision in State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  There’s one criminal case on the docket for oral argument this week, Setzer v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 3:40 am by Russ Bensing
  The US Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
  Excellent treatment of Crawford… In State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:54 am by Russ Bensing
  This raises a Crawford issue, and the court sua sponte requested supplemental briefing on that issue after the SCOTUS decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
Bryant, concerning the scope of the “ongoing emergency” standard for determining whether a victim’s statement is testimonial under Crawford v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:25 am by Russ Bensing
In the category of Least Unanticipated Events, we have the Ohio Supreme Court’s unanimous decision last week in State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
I think the bigger problem is that the database approach views cases quantitatively, rather than qualitatively:  Blakely and Crawford are no more significant than Arizona v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
  Conley also provides more Adventures with Crawford v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:26 am by Russ Bensing
  Three weeks ago the 6th Circuit ended Colon’s odyssey through the criminal justice system by concluding that the admission of those statements didn’t violate Colon’s confrontation rights under Crawford v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:55 am
United States, 914 A.2d 1 (D.C. 2006) (discussed here), which analyzes  blank">Crawford v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:26 am by Russ Bensing
  These are clearly “testimonial” statements under Crawford v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
They don’t worry about that stuff in the courts of appeals, either, so let’s take a look to see what’s happened there… In State v. [read post]