Search for: "Com. v. Price, T." Results 41 - 60 of 175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm by Eric Goldman
According to the FTC: While 1-800 Contacts prices below traditional ECPs, its price is on average higher than that of other online merchants, often by a substantial amount. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:52 am
A more usual decision from the 6th is US v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 11:53 am by Eric
History * Antone Johnson on the dot-com hangover of 2000-2002 [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/9guVzqNKyc -> Short phrase not protected by copyright PERSONAL KEEPSAKES v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:38 am by Venkat
I offer my data free for use to the Schipperke fancy [sic], not for a price, or to be held hostage by MBFS.You keep saying that you aren't charging for the data on your site that you took from mine. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:41 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
In fact, he observes, "[t]he patent could be perfectly valid but worth very little to the licensee, or at least worth only a small fraction of the markup contained in the product price fix. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:37 pm by Donald Clarke
The latter point has attracted a great deal of commentary to date, but some of that commentary has overlooked important details, so please don’t forget to read Section V at the end. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 3:41 am
 Reasoning doesn't get much more circular than that. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
The low price is a key feature emphasised in the sites, typically with percentage reductions, and with higher prices being compared and struck though. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am by Russ Bensing
  Back in 2005, in Gonzalez v. [read post]