Search for: "Com. v. Walsh, T."
Results 41 - 60
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2011, 6:14 am
About twenty years after Wilson, the court in State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:25 am
No, Virginia, it doesn’t work. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:45 am
” Even though the judge said he’d refer a defendant for a competency evaluation, his failure to do so isn’t error when the record doesn’t indicate any evidence that the defendant is incompetent, says the 8th District in State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 3:52 am
Defendants don’t fare so well in State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
Here’s one more case to stick in your response as to why you can’t do that: the 6th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:40 am
Caldero: since a Megan’s Law offender can’t be reclassified under the Adam Walsh Act, and the AWA now provides the penalties for failure to register, etc., a Megan’s Law offender can’t be prosecuted at all. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:37 am
Williams (discussed here), holding that the Adam Walsh Act was punitive, and couldn’t be applied retroactively to people who committed offenses prior to its effective date. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
The court also holds that where the offenses were committed over a period of time, some before and some after the effective date of the Adam Walsh Act, classification under the AWA was permissible… In State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:47 am
Too bad, says the 2nd District; an agreed sentence isn’t even reviewable on appeal… In State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:33 am
Wheat, State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:23 am
One of them was State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:15 am
This is but more of the residue of the Adam Walsh Act. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Booking.com, which asks whether the addition of “.com” to a generic term creates a protectable trademark, and Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:07 am
Gingell, which involved the retroactivity of the Adam Walsh Act. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:34 am
Alltop, the 2nd District reaffirms a decision from last year holding that the increased penalties under the Adam Walsh for a sex offender’s failure to notify or verify an address cannot be applied to Megan’s Law offenders… Two cases on conflicts of interest: in State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am
Back in 2005, in Gonzalez v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 3:58 am
The constitutionality of Ohio’s Adam Walsh Act, the latest effort to impose ever more Draconian sanctions on sex offenders, is presently pending before the Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:13 am
That argument’s never made any headway: it was rejected in State v. [read post]
