Search for: "Committee for Public Counsel Services v. Attorney General" Results 41 - 60 of 701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While courts generally recognize and enforce contractual agreements by a party to consent to jurisdiction, mere registration of an out-of-state business to do business in a state historically has not been recognized as creating the necessary “substantial minimum contacts” that the Due Process clause of the United States Constitution generally requires exist to provide the general personal jurisdiction that must exist for a state court to possess jurisdiction to… [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
He served as Investigative Counsel on the House Select Committee, where he was a lead counsel on the committee's investigations into domestic extremism and social media's role in the attempted insurrection. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:18 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Now, she has been called by the House Judiciary Committee to testify to Congress about that. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
In regards to administration, the court’s inaugural annual report (2007-2008) stated: “The courts must be administered to maintain the independence of the judiciary, recognize the very separate and distinct roles and responsibilities of the Attorney General and the judiciary, encourage public access to the courts and public confidence in the administration of justice, further the provision of high-quality services to the public, and… [read post]
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by Eric Columbus
”   When I represented House committees (then controlled by Democrats) as a special litigation counsel at the House Office of General Counsel, subpoena recipients—most prominently Trump and his ilk—constantly argued that the committees’ “real” goal was to get Trump for political reasons, or to put him on trial for wrongdoing, and that the investigation thus lacked a legitimate legislative purpose. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by James Petrila
It has been controversial since its predecessor, the Protect America Act, was first passed in 2007 in response to public disclosures of President George W. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am by Ryan Goodman
  Falsifying hush money payments as legal services frustrated New York State authorities’ more broadly. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm by Dani Selby
In 2016, Swarns served as lead counsel for Buck, arguing Buck v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am by madeo-design
Her judicial service began in 1992 when President George H.W. [read post]