Search for: "Commonwealth v. Adams, T."
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2012, 5:10 pm
Reaffirming the rebuttable presumption of propriety for peremptory challenges, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 1:28 pm
In the courts Keyu v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
§3050(a.4)(4)(v). [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am
Design Patents Have Come - http://bit.ly/RjToW4 (Lisa Shuchman) iWin: Apple Defeats Samsung in Key Pre-Trial Motion - http://bit.ly/OzXID3 (Michael Pontrelli) Fighting Over Rectangles: Why Apple Can't Win The Patent War - http://bit.ly/OBA32j (Skylar Greene) Apple, Samsung, Dance the Courtroom Jig - Lucy Koh Hears Evidence on the Origin of the Oblong - http://bit.ly/OD3uDR (Tamlin Magee) In Apple-Samsung trial, it's John Quinn v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:45 am
Benjamin Curtis – in his capacity as an attorney in Boston – argued in the 1836 case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:50 pm
Our final relist is Adams v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
APPGER and extraordinary rendition Panopticon has blogged on the First Tier Tribunal’s decision on the set of requests made by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Extraordinary Rendition (“APPGER”) to the Foreign & Commonwealth Office: APPGER v Information Commissioner and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office EA/2011/0049-0051. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Of this book, the American Monthly reviewer wrote: [T]he work is a rare union of patience, brilliancy, and acuteness, and . . . [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
(Carcieri v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:56 pm
Bank v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
Partly this is due to an impoverished concept of property; that property only refers to tangible objects (forgetting about intangibles like stocks, bonds, promissory notes, and other financial instruments), or that copyright can’t be property because infringement doesn’t deprive the holder of possession or ownership (except if I smash your car window, we’d say I violated your property rights even though you still possess the same amount of glass). [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
See also Adam Wagner’s review of recent developments in terrorism law. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:00 pm
Tactics “unduly inflexible” and used “unjustified force” Secretary of State for the Foreign Office & Commonwealth Affairs v Maftah & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 350 (13 April 2011) : Court of appeal: Review of financial anti-terror sanctions imposed on 2 Libyans not a determination of article 6 ECHR civil rights Rahman, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWHC 944 (Admin) (31 March 2011): High Court rules Birmingham… [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:05 am
See State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
Commonwealth, 2010 Ky. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
COMMONWEALTH v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
COMMONWEALTH v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:50 pm
Check out Scott Greenfield's post on Berghuis v. [read post]
MySpace Evidence: Maryland Appeals Court Allows Circumstantial Authentication -- Griffin v. Maryland
28 May 2010, 4:52 pm
" Commonwealth v. [read post]
