Search for: "Commonwealth v. Home, C. -"
Results 41 - 60
of 417
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
§ 1101) (15) The term "immigrant" means every alien except an alien who is within one of the following classes of nonimmigrant aliens— (A)(i) an ambassador, public minister, or career diplomatic or consular officer who has been accredited by a foreign government, recognized de jure by the United States and who is accepted by the President or by the Secretary of State, and the members of the alien's immediate family; (ii) upon a basis of reciprocity, other officials and… [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:34 pm
§ 12-711(b)(2)(C). [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
C-48-CV–2919-01979 (C.P. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm
Code § 3700.69(c). [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:17 am
The case of Privacy International v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, the Secretary for State for the Home Department and the UK security and intelligence agencies (SIAs) (Case C-623/17) concerns the conditions under which SIAs may process communications metadata (i.e. traffic and location data, not message content) collected by telecommunications providers. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:17 pm
See Burwell v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 2:22 pm
” G.L. c. 149, § 190(a). [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:56 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm
The Australian class action market continues to be attractive to funders[iii], with at least 25 litigation funders now calling Australia home. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
SHAK v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
Also eligible would be those who have been told by a doctor or government official to stay home because of exposure or symptoms. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
(c) Minimum closure requirement. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
There are certainly some judges in the Commonwealth who are hostile to non-compete agreements and would take the latter approach, so careful drafting will be necessary if S.1117 becomes law. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Or, as the Supreme Court noted in Arizona v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
James Room)Panel 3: The Disciplinary State, 2:00-3:30Chair: Erin Braatz, Suffolk University Law School (ebraatz@suffolk.edu)Commentator: Lauren Benton, Vanderbilt University (lauren.benton@vanderbilt.edu)Stacey Hynd, University of Exeter (s.hynd@exeter.ac.uk) (Re-)Constructing Murder: Capital Punishment and the Criminalization of African Bodies in Colonial Ghana, c. 1890-1957Dior Konate, South Carolina State University (dkonate@scsu.edu) Imprisonment and Citizenship in Senegal,… [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 7:10 am
The July 24, 2019 opinion in Stone v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am
For The Wall Street Journal, Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin report that “[t]he Supreme Court on Monday upheld a Virginia law that prohibits uranium mining within the commonwealth’s borders, in a splintered ruling that affirmed the powers of the states to regulate mining on private lands within their territories,” in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:33 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
Research and Resources The Divergent Paths of Commonwealth Privacy Torts, Supreme Court Law Review, vol. 84(2d), pp. 225-267, , 2018), Samuel Beswick and William Fotherby, Harvard University, Law School and Independent Rethinking Liability Rules for Online Hosting Platforms, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn – Universität Mannheim, Discussion Paper Series – CRC TR 224 (2019), Miriam C. [read post]
