Search for: "Conflict of Interest: Police Officer/Attorney Representing Defendant in Municipal Court of Municipality of Employment" Results 41 - 60 of 62
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit revived the House of Representatives’ attempt to enforce a subpoena to former White House counsel Don McGahn but cautioned the case could go unresolved once this Congress’s term ends in January. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Domenech was earlier found to have met in 2017 with attorneys for his former employer, the Texas Public Policy Foundation, while the conservative think tank and the Interior Department were battling over a lawsuit, creating the appearance of a conflict-of-interest. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Women running for office say they often feel pressure to look the part lest they not be taken seriously. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Utah businessperson Steven Lund is helping the FEC defend the dismissal of allegations that Lund and other wealthy donors used shell companies to illegally hide their donations to super PACs. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Joe Walsh, now a conservative radio show host, is challenging President Trump for the Republican nomination on the basis that he represents an alternative to a president who is morally unfit to hold his office. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Two Native American tribes, the Cherokee and the Choctaw, are both granted the right to send delegates to the House of Representatives. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Questions about Barrack complying with the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) arose during former special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election before being referred to the U.S, attorney’s office in Brooklyn. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am by MBettman
In addition, assigning City Attorney Scott to defend the officers while also representing the City created an egregious conflict of interest, because the officers had an enormous interest in enforcing indemnification of the 13.2 million dollar judgment while the City had just as strong an interest in avoiding it. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:23 am by MBettman
Article XVIII, Section 3 of the Ohio Constitution (Home-Rule Amendment — “Municipalities shall have authority to exercise all powers of local self-government and to adopt and enforce within their limits such local police, sanitary and other similar regulations, as are not in conflict with general laws.) [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Instead of listing their actual employers, the series of contributions listed a lobbying firm, the Goldberg Law Offices. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court represents one of his administration’s early accomplishments. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:31 am by Jim Sedor
Politico – Darren Samuelsohn | Published: 2/25/2017 The lawyers tasked with policing Donald Trump’s potential conflicts-of-interest are grappling with an oversight system that is disjointed and ineffective. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 10:01 am by Law Lady
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE, Appellees. 4th District.Torts -- Municipal corporations -- Law enforcement officers -- DUI arrestee's action against city alleging negligent supervision and retention, failure to protect, battery, and negligent infliction of emotional distress based on conduct of police officers while plaintiff was in holding cell and while plaintiff was in police station garage awaiting transport to jail -- Trial… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm by Law Lady
BIRMINGHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF, Defendant, BIRMINGHAM, CITY OF, THE, Defendant-Appellee. 11th Circuit.Federal jurisdiction -- Torts -- Removal of state court action to federal court -- Timeliness -- Appellate court need not decide whether defendant's notice of removal was timely in instant case because any error in failing to remand case to state court on ground that notice of removal was untimely would be procedural… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
Under the proposed Consent Decree, the defendants in the action will implement the Operable Unit One remedy, addressing soil contamination at the Site, and pay $1.5 million towards EPA’s unrecovered past response costs. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
The trial court imposed $60,000 in damages plus attorneys fees now approaching $1 million. [read post]