Search for: "Conflict of Interest Insurance Policy Disputed Facts re Coverage"
Results 41 - 60
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
The company asserted it was also a violation of its integrity/conflict of interest policy, which provides that falsifying, destroying, or misusing a company document constitutes a major policy violation warranting discharge. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
The company asserted it was also a violation of its integrity/conflict of interest policy, which provides that falsifying, destroying, or misusing a company document constitutes a major policy violation warranting discharge. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
The company asserted it was also a violation of its integrity/conflict of interest policy, which provides that falsifying, destroying, or misusing a company document constitutes a major policy violation warranting discharge. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 5:24 pm
It is public policy that if the child(ren) are on CHIPS or MEDICAID, the Court requires that one spouse maintain insurance coverage for the child(ren) while the other spouse reimburses the State for insurance coverage in the amount of $50.00 or higher. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 5:24 pm
It is public policy that if the child(ren) are on CHIPS or MEDICAID, the Court requires that one spouse maintain insurance coverage for the child(ren) while the other spouse reimburses the State for insurance coverage in the amount of $50.00 or higher. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
HOWARD DINNER, D.C., P.A., a/a/o DENISE CHAPMAN, Respondent. 4th District.Civil procedure -- Default on motor vehicle lease -- Summary judgment -- Trial court properly entered summary judgment where there were no issues of material fact -- Remand for correction of scrivener's errorGEORGE C. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:32 pm
There is no dispute that Alzheimer’s is indeed a “disease,” a characterization that usually implies a status process that someone does not choose, and cannot avoid. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
From an insurance coverage standpoint, private equity sponsors and their insurers should ensure that the outside director or executive coverage of their general partnership insurance policies as well as the portfolio company’s insurance policies consider that certain individuals may constitute “acting managers” of a portfolio company and evaluate whether existing policy language is sufficient to… [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:04 am
In fact, I anticipate LEED being a “greener” pasture! [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
q=Appointment+to+positions+in+New+York+State%E2%80%99s+Civil+Service Arbitrator rules that qualified retirees and future retirees to have the same health insurance coverage as the employer's active employees http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2017/2017_08107.htm Arbitrator's award may only be vacated by a court if it violates public policy, is irrational or it exceeds specified limitations on the arbitrator's power … [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
q=Appointment+to+positions+in+New+York+State%E2%80%99s+Civil+Service Arbitrator rules that qualified retirees and future retirees to have the same health insurance coverage as the employer's active employees http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2017/2017_08107.htm Arbitrator's award may only be vacated by a court if it violates public policy, is irrational or it exceeds specified limitations on the arbitrator's power … [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
You may read other coverage of this elsewhere, as in attendance were Aric Press of The American Lawyer, Leigh Jones of The National Law Journal, David Lat of AboveTheLaw, and other reporters. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:02 pm
” The Commission says Heslin has a “debilitating conflict of interest” resulting from his $2 [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
Specifically, the Age 29 Law “expands access to health insurance through a COBRA-like benefit for young adults by requiring commercial insurers, non-profit corporations, and HMOs to offer an option to continue coverage for unmarried young adults through age 29, regardless of financial dependence, under a parent’s group health insurance policy. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
Is the individual charged with overseeing cyber-defense the same person who reports up the chain about breaches and who would oversee any response–if so, does that dual-role indicate a conflict of interest? [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
The fact that this is an electronic publication permits the user to locate information in the database by using key words and phrases.You may order your copy of The Section 207-a/c Case Book by sending your name, the name of your organization, your mailing address and telephone number, purchase order number, confirmation of your tax exempt status, if appropriate, and your e-mail address to:Publications@nycap.rr.comor you may mail your organization's purchase order form to:Public… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
His complaint alleged that by bad advice, deception, and coercion, the attorneys, who had a conflict of interest, induced him to settle for a lower amount than he had told them he would accept, and for less than the case was worth. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Lauderdale Division.Bankruptcy -- Confirmation -- Chapter 13 plan -- Good faith -- Chapter 13 debtors failed to carry their burden to establish confirmation of good faith plan where debtors purchased and financed vehicles shortly before their bankruptcy filings in contemplation of those filings, and then proposed chapter 13 plan which would repay the 910-day car claim at less than contractual interest rates such that plans were not proposed in good faith -- Confirmation denied without… [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
Supreme Court.Attorney's fees -- Prevailing party -- Injunction -- Trial court erred in awarding prevailing party attorney's fees to homeowners association in action seeking injunction to require that homeowner obtain insurance on home in accordance with subdivision declaration where association had adequate remedy at law by obtaining insurance coverage on home and assessing the cost against the homeowner -- Because association had adequate remedy at law, trial… [read post]
