Search for: "Connolly v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2009, 8:15 am
Ct. 2527) the Supreme Court found the introduction of state forensic-lab reports is testimonial evidence requiring the appearance at trial of lab technicians.Here is a list of some subsequent decisions:Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:23 am
By Kevin Connolly On an issue of apparent national first impression, the Houston Court of Appeals, in XTO Energy Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:16 pm
Charles Coble at the Newsroom Law Blog comments on the United States Supreme Court's decision to deny certiorari in Salzano v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 2:46 pm
In 10x Genomics, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:15 pm
From today's decision in Williams v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:42 pm
Shanmugam, a lawyer with William & Connolly who represented Mr. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:03 pm
Connolly[1] and Masayuki Atsumi[2] [This is Part 2 of a multi-part article on ways a foreign fugitive may be able to get some issues heard by a US federal court without surrendering to the United States and personally appearing in court. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Shanmugam, Partner, Williams & Connolly Kathleen M. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:30 pm
Rogers, a lecturer in the Department of History at Central Connecticut State University, has published Workers against the City: The Fight for Free Speech in Hague v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:28 pm
Connolly v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm
Shanmugam, Partner at Williams & Connolly LLP; Hon. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 11:15 pm
Justice Connolly implicitly overrules the courts 1994 precedent Hoiengs v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
In People of the State of Michigan v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:36 pm
In his book Pluralism, William Connolly describes it as follows: "The Westphalian accord in early modern Europe recognized the sovereignty of each European state over its citizens by pushing religious differences into the private realm. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Roman, J.P., Duffy, Barros and Connolly, JJ., concur. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Roman, J.P., Duffy, Barros and Connolly, JJ., concur. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 8:37 pm
McIntyre v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
CONNOLLY, J.P. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
CONNOLLY, J.P. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
Connolly [1] and Masayuki Atsumi [2] The fugitive disentitlement doctrine is an equitable doctrine under which a court has the discretion to decline to consider a petition of a defendant if that defendant does not appear before the court. [read post]
