Search for: "Conservation Law Foundation v. Public Utilities Commission"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
This is true at the time of the commission of the offence, and remains true when the offender is imprisoned, as has been recognised in the case of Hirst v United Kingdom (No. 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 41. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the… [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
In that case, a Quebec statute provided that patients could not obtain private health insurance for medical services available within the public health care system. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
The full-court press drew on the GOP’s protest that Silicon Valley is biased against conservatives, a claim disputed by the companies. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Lake Norconian Club Foundation v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Private parties are generally not required to volunteer all relevant information on the risks of their products, and government agencies tend to use their powers to access information conservatively. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:45 am
” (Cleveland National Forest Foundation, supra, 3 Cal.5th at p. 504.) [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Under such a law, the public official will no longer betray his constituency. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
The only statutory authority OPR cites to support its action is a non-CEQA statute (the Warren-Alquist State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Act, at Pub. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
The trade laws, especially in the United States, delegate to private interests rights to countermand public policy. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
The trade laws, especially in the United States, delegate to private interests rights to countermand public policy. [read post]
