Search for: "Constantine v. Constantine"
Results 41 - 60
of 191
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2021, 1:09 pm
Branch v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 1:26 pm
LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm
On 17 February 2021 Saini J heard an application in the case of Weaver v British Airways. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm
” 3) Copyright vs data protection: CJEU grappling with the right to information about infringers by Giulia Priora “On 9 July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C-264/19 Constantin Film Verleih v YouTube and Google Inc. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:28 am
” 3) Copyright vs data protection: CJEU grappling with the right to information about infringers by Giulia Priora “On 9 July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C-264/19 Constantin Film Verleih v YouTube and Google Inc. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 10:39 am
Jeffery Neuberger v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 7:03 pm
Dean v Town of Poland Zoning Board of Appeals, 2020 WL 4249790 (NYAD 4 Dept. 7/24/2020) [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am
In addition, like the AG had done in his Opinion in Constantin Film [here and here], the Opinion expressly rejects what it calls a ‘dynamic’ interpretation of the law (in respect of intermediaries’ stay down obligations: see [194]).Let’s now move on to the core of the AG’s construction of liability under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 3:38 pm
In 2018, the Supreme Court ruled in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:27 am
This, in a nutshell, is the question which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had been required to answer in Constantin Film v YouTube, C-264/19.The referral, which Germany’s Federal Court of Justice had made, focused on the interpretation of Article 8(2)(a) of the Enforcement Directive, a piece of EU legislation adopted in 2004.The background national proceedings had originated from the refusal, by YouTube and its parent company Google, to provide film… [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:41 pm
In his dissent in Bostock v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 8:41 am
Lacey v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 6:15 am
The case, Lanard Toys Limited v. [read post]
23 May 2020, 5:38 pm
Sterling v. [read post]
