Search for: "Consumer Sales Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission"
Results 41 - 60
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2017, 5:59 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:56 am
Filed under: antitrust, economics, federal trade commission, merger guidelines, mergers & acquisitions [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:10 pm
Finally, the Federal Trade Commission has taken an aggressive stance over the years against the legality of such agreements, see e.g., Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
International Trade Commission, et al., No. 16-428 (Whether Section 337(a)(1)(A) permits the ITC to adjudicate claims regarding trade secret misappropriation alleged to have occurred outside the United States.) [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used interchangeably, opponents of parallel imports prefer to refer to the… [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission released a preliminary report on advertising and news generated by digital platforms. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 6:50 am
Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
and Cadbury Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:32 pm
AT&T does the same thing with its retail DSL sales. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Instead, we write to express our unanimous view the SEC has clear statutory authority to mandate additional climate-related disclosures for publicly traded companies. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
Distinguishing Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 7:17 pm
See Hy Cite Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Mobileye, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Federal Trade Commission 13-534Issue: Whether, for purposes of the state-action exemption from federal antitrust law, an official state regulatory board created by state law may properly be treated as a “private” actor simply because, pursuant to state law, a majority of the board’s members are also market participants who are elected to their official positions by other market participants. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
International Trade Commission, et al., No. 16-428 (Whether Section 337(a)(1)(A) permits the ITC to adjudicate claims regarding trade secret misappropriation alleged to have occurred outside the United States.) [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
International Trade Commission, et al., No. 16-428 (Whether Section 337(a)(1)(A) permits the ITC to adjudicate claims regarding trade secret misappropriation alleged to have occurred outside the United States.) [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IPKat) Benoit Battistelli, director general of France’s INPI, appointed as next chair of EPO Administrative Council (Managing Intellectual Property) European patent trolls feel the heat: Nokia reports IP.com to the European Commission (IAM) Agricultural product quality: MARQUES speaks out (Class 46) European Patent Office to replace corrupt US assignment data (Daily Dose of IP) Finland Helsinki Court of Appeal denies Akun Tehdas Oy’s appeal and maintains… [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:43 am
The settlement, approved in a unanimous vote of the Federal Trade Commission's four members, was filed with the U.S. [read post]