Search for: "Conyer v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2011, 1:08 pm
A different constitutional amendment addressing the Citizen’s United decision was introduced in September by Congressman John Conyers. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:35 am
His failure to do so, to pin the blame on Mustafa, when he did blurt out that he wasn't the shooter, undermines the credibility of his trial testimony.The majority held, notably in contrast to the United States Supreme Court's misguided decision in Berghuis v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
(Class 99) (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC (Ch): Plane users can’t tell airlines from airways: United Airlines Inc v United Airways Limited (IPKat) PPC page 32: Quickstep – are there difficulties changing course with 8 tentacles? [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:25 am
” The United States has made no attempt to defend or justify what it had done to Arar. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am
LEARN IT, LIVE IT, LOVE IT SECURITIZATION The History of Financial Regulation in the United States What is Securitization? [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
United States PTO, 2010 U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:02 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 2:07 pm
Conyers v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:51 pm
John Conyers points out, this is not an exoneration. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am
Finally, Wendy Kaminer has a piece for the Atlantic on the federal sex offender case, United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm
Iqbal is a 2009 decision of the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) that may have an impact on the standard applied to motions to dismiss in state courts with rules that are modeled on the federal rules. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 11:31 am
The patch is "required for the United States" and blocks updated versions of Word from reading "the Custom XML elements contained within DOCX, DOCM, or XML files. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:07 am
Javaid Iqball and other detainees filed suit in the United States District Court in New York City against former U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 4:04 am
At the very least, any legislative effort is premature, pending a study to measure the possible effects of the Iqbal and Twombly decisions that is being conducted by the Judicial Conference of the United States. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 10:46 am
McDonough et al. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:25 am
In a states' rights oriented decision, United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
(Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: Independent consultant held jointly liable for infringement: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (PatLit) Can THE JOURNAL ever be distinctive for a journal? [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) Global Global - General World IP Day, 26 April, approaching (IPKat) … [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 10:00 pm
Sec. 154 states that a patent grant shall be for a term beginning on the date on which the patent issues and ending 20 years from the date on which the application for the patent was filed in the United States or, if the application contains certain specific references to an earlier filed application or applications, from the date on which the earliest such application was filed. [read post]
