Search for: "Cook v. Tax" Results 41 - 60 of 366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
County of Cook (7th Cir. 1998) ("We have criticized the overuse of pseudonyms in federal litigation, pointing out that the public has a right to know who is utilizing the federal courts that its tax dollars support. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am by Florian Mueller
Even on appeal they're going to continue to have a huge credibility issue.There is one concern that the judge voiced during the trial as well as in her ruling and which probably deserves a lot more attention: impulse purchasing.When the judge examined Apple CEO Tim Cook, she discussed with him Apple's choice to monetize the App Store primarily through its tax on in-app purchases. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Transgender Employment Discrimination Risks Rising In 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Digital services taxes collected by the countries issuing the statement will be credited against future income taxes ahead of a multinational tax agreement that will go into effect in 2023. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:21 am by Florian Mueller
By the way, patent law is exclusively federal law...A couple of months ago, a Nokia policy officer noted on LinkedIn that Apple opposes value-based (ad valorem, percentage of sales) SEP royalties but taxes app developers at a rate of 30% (which Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers accurately summed up in her examination of Apple CEO Tim Cook as "charging the gamers to subsidize Wells Fargo"). [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 6:19 am by Russell Knight
Cook County Rule 13.8(a)(v) The point of holding someone in contempt is to make them comply with the order. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
Bentley v Bentley: Clothing beats Motors again in the Court of AppealBentley Motors Limited v (1) Bentley 1962 Limited (2) Brandlogic Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 1726 (December 2020) This was the first ever case featured in Retromark and turned up again in Volume 7. [read post]