Search for: "Cooke v. Cooke et al" Results 41 - 60 of 761
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2011, 2:17 pm
The Illinois Appellate Court has affirmed a ruling by a Cook County associate judge who denied a forum non conveniens challenge brought by Motorola in Joseph Erwin, Jr., et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:45 pm by WIMS
Petitioners Alaska Survival, Sierra Club, and Cook Inletkeeper seek review of the Surface Transportation Board's (STB) decision authorizing Alaska Railroad Corporation (ARRC) to construct about thirty-five miles of new rail line between Port MacKenzie, located in Alaska's Cook Inlet, and the railroad's main line, located near Wasilla, Alaska. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:33 am
My good friend Mike Maslanka has an excellent post up on his Work Matters Blog this week discussing the Texas Supreme Court's granting review of  Marsh USA Inc, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:16 am
Despite the defendants' claims that the plaintiff had not been seriously injured in a Cook County car accident, the Illinois jury awarded him $97,433 in Kenneth Linkevich v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:28 am by Colleen McGushin
On April 9, the Texas Supreme Court granted review in Marsh USA Inc, et al. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 2:43 pm
A Cook County jury verdict was entered in favor of the University of Chicago Hospitals in a 2005 trial and was upheld on appeal to the Illinois Appellate Court (Kashief Weathers et al. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 5:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Circuit materials: Opinion Chehalis et al Brief Navajo et al Brief NCAI Brief ANVCA Brief US Brief Alaska Federation of Natives Amicus Brief Cook Inlet Region Amicus Brief Chehalis et al Reply Navajo et al Reply District Court materials: 1 Complaint 3 Complaint 4 Motion for TRO 5 Motion for TRO 21 US Brief 23 Ahtna Amicus Brief 25 Gila River Amicus Brief 30 Chehalis Reply 36 DCT Order 76-2 CRST MSJ 77 Chehalis MSJ 78-1… [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:32 am
Qualified immunity is available as a defense where there is “no clearly established law” concerning the alleged act or omission DiStico v Cook, et al, USCA, 2nd Circuit, Docket #10-4304-cv The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed, in part, a United States District Court’s denial of motions by a school principal and two teachers for summary judgment dismissing the action against them based on their claim that they were… [read post]