Search for: "Cooper v. Bunch"
Results 41 - 60
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2015, 8:07 pm
Hartley expressed his views on the case and explained new strategies developed under English law to protect the effects of choice of court agreements, like the one shown in AMT Futures Limited v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 7:18 pm
Lawyers are a self-important bunch, and this fact inevitably shows up in assessments of their role in sentencing. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 1:08 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 12:44 am
V. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 11:50 am
–Boston v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
John Neiman is Chair of the Appellate Group at Maynard, Cooper & Gale P.C. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
Case citation: Munroe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm
Litigation is unfortunate exception to peaceful rule of productive cooperation. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:18 am
For more details on U.S. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:04 am
That said, wow, these are a bunch of cases that a scholar of sentencing and supervised release law would love. [read post]
[Sasha Volokh] How a state dentistry board hounded non-dentist teeth-whiteners out of North Carolina
28 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Today, I’ll talk about the details of North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 8:39 pm
Williams State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
The truth often is that, for one reason or another, the prescribing physician did not rely on the particular warning in question, and thus a different one wouldn’t have made any difference.There are a number of fact patterns that lead to physician non-reliance, the golden boy of the bunch being when a doctor (a trained professional, after all) already knew about the risk in question and thus did not need to be warned about it. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
But it impedes the enterprise, while supplying a bunch of judicially enforced coordination rules. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
After trying to defend state autonomy on the academic conference circuit to mostly liberal audiences, I heaved a sigh of relief: “This will be great—a bunch of conservatives who actually care about states. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:47 am
Yesterday, we had a new UMG v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
("a state law requirement that the drug be completely withdrawn from the market, based solely on a theory that the federally mandated label was inadequate, would also impermissibly conflict with federal law"); Cooper v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:29 am
As weird as it might sound, there are a bunch plaintiffs claiming that they were injured by popcorn. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 5:50 pm
Cooper B-Line, Inc., slip op., No. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
There were a bunch of Medicare cuts or reductions in Medicare payment increases under our 1965 Medicare "a la carte" program, and there were reductions to Medicare advantage plans as well. [read post]
