Search for: "Cooper v. Corporate Property Investors"
Results 41 - 60
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am
Statements must be sent to the fund or, in certain cases, investors in the fund, within 120 days after the fund’s fiscal year-end. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am
Statements must be sent to the fund or, in certain cases, investors in the fund, within 120 days after the fund’s fiscal year-end. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:38 am
Cooper and Sons, does not list Nike as a brand that it offers. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
As a result, we would expect that a Title III debtor will seek to use all of the tools inherent in the Title III process to advance the relevant PPP project and make it more attractive to investors. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am
Likewise, the Patent Cooperation Treaty has a state to state dispute settlement provision involving recourse at the International Court of Justice.So, Eli Lilly instead basically sought to have a NAFTA panel of three arbitrators overrule the SCC, which presumably saw no need to hear a case that challenged a long, evolutionary and clear line of Canadian case law. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am
Likewise, the Patent Cooperation Treaty has a state to state dispute settlement provision involving recourse at the International Court of Justice.So, Eli Lilly instead basically sought to have a NAFTA panel of three arbitrators overrule the SCC, which presumably saw no need to hear a case that challenged a long, evolutionary and clear line of Canadian case law. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 5:55 am
Cooper, Luke A. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
One private law theme for Limelight: defective formation corporate law Q: group of folks get together to form a corporation but somehow overlook the corporate formalities. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:05 am
More charges will likely follow in 2017, including corporate plea deals. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
The system is also a one-way ratchet because corporations can sue, forcing governments to spend significant resources, while governments impacted by foreign corporations cannot bring any claims. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:38 pm
We will also need proof that the landlord owns the property and has the authority to enter into the lease. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 2:47 am
However, The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has subsequently had to decide on fundamental issues raised by patenting of embryo stem cells in Brüstle (see Katposts hereand here) and International Stem Cell Corporation v Comptroller (see Katpost here).The patenting of medicines leads to the ‘access to medicines’ debate (see Katpost here). [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:59 am
”[v] If SEC or other proposed federal regulation of cybersecurity becomes a reality, implementing the Framework could be a mandatory exercise. [read post]
