Search for: "Cooper v. Pittsburgh" Results 41 - 60 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2012, 7:14 am
Co. of Pittsburgh Pa., 105 AD2d 627, 628, 481 N.Y.S.2d 358 [1st Dept 1984]). [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:20 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Holy Spirit Hospital, Discovery of Expert Information after Cooper v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:53 am by Alain Leibman
Volante, Esq., the author of this entry, is an associate with Fox Rothschild LLP, based in our Pittsburgh, PA office. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 8:48 am by Robert Wagner
The Court found this to be “arms-length cooperation” and not an agency relationship. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
This post has been submitted by John Iole, a partner in the Pittsburgh office of the Jones Day law firm. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:16 pm by Michael Ginsborg
(Volokh Conspiracy) I link to a Cooper profile here.Marriage equality v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:10 pm
City of Pittsburgh, 194 F.3d 434, 439 n.3 (3d Cir. 1999); Baughman v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Magistrate Amy Reynolds Hay of Pittsburgh ruled Tuesday that PennEnvironment couldn’t prove that excessive discharge levels from Reliant Energy’s Conemaugh Generating Station near New Florence caused damage to the river. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
Magistrate Amy Reynolds Hay of Pittsburgh ruled Tuesday that PennEnvironment couldn’t prove that excessive discharge levels from Reliant Energy’s Conemaugh Generating Station near New Florence caused damage to the river. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:36 pm
The attorney general in Morrison [v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
G-2/08 (PatLit) MARQUES and other organisation take united position on the Cooperation Fund (Class 46) EU communication on future of competition law framework for motor vehicle sector (BLOG@IP::JUR) EU ‘Friends of the Presidency Group’ discussing non-agricultural geographic indications (BLOG@IP::JUR) Scents and sense – or perfumes for peanuts? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]