Search for: "Cope v. Social Security Administration"
Results 41 - 60
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against Visalia, California -based Magnolia Health Corporation and its affiliates (Magnolia) highlights the need for healthcare industry and other U.S. employers adequacy and defensibility of their practices for offering accommodation to, hiring, screening and other employment practices with respect to persons with actual or perceived disabilities in light of the EEOC’s prioritization of disability discrimination enforcement under the Obama… [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:29 pm
Stamer works with U.S. and foreign businesses, governments, trade associations, and others on workforce, social security and severance, health care, immigration, privacy and [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
Administrators, insurers or other fiduciaries responsible for administration of these coverages must properly coordinate, and sponsoring employers should consult with legal counsel about auditing their plans for proper coordination of these processes across these different service providers. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
The DOL DFVCP is available for use by plan administrators of retirement or welfare benefit plans sponsored by employers of all sizes. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am
Insurers and third party administrators providing claims and appeals services also should be concerned. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm
According to OCR, its investigation of the complaint revealed among other things that: SEMC improperly disclosed the PHI of at least 1,093 individuals; SEMC failed to implement sufficient security measures regarding the transmission of and storage of ePHI to reduce risks and vulnerabilities to a reasonable and appropriate level; and SEMC failed to timely identify and respond to a known security incident, mitigate the harmful effects of the security incident, and document… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm
Meanwhile, the pro-worker’s rights Obama Administration has made enforcement of these rules a high priority. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
With the Obama Administration construing the United States Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution entitled same-sex couples to equal treatment with married heterosexual couples under federal law in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:42 pm
Stamer works with U.S. and foreign businesses, governments, trade associations, and others on workforce, social security and severance, health care, immigration, privacy and data security, tax, ethics and other laws and regulations. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 12:09 pm
Stamer works with U.S. and foreign businesses, governments, trade associations, and others on workforce, social security and severance, health care, immigration, privacy and data security, tax, ethics and other laws and regulations. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
Employers using or considering using health risk assessments or other wellness programs should carefully monitor a new Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lawsuit, EEOC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:29 pm
A primary drafter of the Bolivian Social Security pension privatization law, Ms. [read post]
29 May 2013, 10:51 pm
Despite ACA’ amendments to HIPAA’s bona fide wellness program rules and the 11th Circuit’s rejection of an EEOC challenge in Broward County v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm
Noting that “[v]arious situations have come to the attention of the Departments where a health insurance policy is advertised as fixed indemnity coverage” that do not “Meet the conditions for excepted benefits,” FAQ XI warns, “The Departments plan to work with the States to ensure that health insurance issuers comply with relevant requirements for different types of insurance policies and provide consumers the protections of the Affordable Care… [read post]
