Search for: "Corwin v. Corwin"
Results 41 - 60
of 206
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
Voigt v Metcalf, C.A. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 2:01 pm
The court provides a practical, educational elucidation of why the efforts to “cleanse” the transaction did not revive the business judgment rule, in light of the failure to satisfy the prerequisites discussed in Corwin v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
Corwin, John Marshall and the Constitution: A Chronicle of the Supreme Court (1977) Mark A. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
Ann Lipton’s commentary about how Delaware’s Corwin doctrine has warped its approach to controlling shareholder cases. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Since the Delaware Supreme Court’s Kahn v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:17 pm
Corwin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
Back to a subject near and dear to my heart: The increased pressure on the definition of “controlling stockholder” occasioned by Corwin v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:31 am
Halper, Ellen V. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
In Garfield v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Garfield v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 6:58 am
By Matthew Solum, Kirkland & Ellis LLP The Supreme Court of Delaware held in Corwin v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 8:47 am
Boilermakers v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:23 am
This is change that is in some sense legal, perhaps even equivalent in significance to a formal amendment, but falls outside the Article V process. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 5:58 am
In its October 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Since the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 Corwin v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
., on Friday, July 5, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Dual-class stock, ESG, Institutional Investors, Lyft, Shareholder voting, Uber Director Independence and Oversight Obligation in Marchand v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Under Corwin v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:39 am
Facebook also asserted that if plaintiffs sought to investigate a potential Caremark claim, the Demand Letter failed to provide any evidence that Facebook “utterly failed to implement a reporting system or ignored red flags”, citing Beatrice Corwin Living Irrevocable Tr. v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 9:34 am
But Corwin's list is wrong. [read post]