Search for: "Cosby v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
United States CNN reports that a settlement has been reached in a defamation case against Bill Cosby — but representatives for the comedian say he didn’t cut the deal. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Concurring last month in the denial of a petition for review by a woman who had sued Bill Cosby for defamation, Justice Thomas called for the re-examination of New York Times v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:44 am
Cosby, in which Thomas called on the court to “abandon New York Times v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm
Judgment was reserved. .United States There has been widespread reporting of Thomas J’s concurring opinion [pdf] in the case of McKee v Cosby to the effect that the US Supreme Court should reconsider New York Times v Sullivan. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm
Cosby on February 19, concurring in the Supreme Court's decision not to hear a libel case brought against one of Bill Cosby's rape accusers. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm
Cosby. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:57 am
Cosby attracted some sympathetic commentary, mostly suggesting that the constitutional law of libel post-Times v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
Cosby, calling it an “alarming … opinion that may signal the start of a prolonged attack on the First Amendment. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:58 am
Cosby In his concurrence, Justice Thomas began by focusing on the jurisprudence that came after New York Times v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:15 pm
Cosby, in which he criticized the rule of New York Times v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:07 am
US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Tuesday called for the court to review its ruling in New York Times v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:45 am
Supreme Court ought to reconsider New York Times v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
Cosby, Thomas “called for reconsideration of a landmark First Amendment precedent, criticizing [New York Times v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:15 am
Up to that point, defamation law was merely a matter of state law. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 10:58 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law United States Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, writing a concurring opinion from the denial of certiorari in McKee v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:38 am
McKee argued that one of Cosby’s lawyers wrote a defamatory letter that was leaked to the public, but her lawsuit was dismissed on the ground that she had become, at least for purposes of the allegations against Cosby, a public figure and could not recover damages unless she could show that Cosby and his lawyers acted with malice. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:31 am
Cosby, No. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 8:26 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 6:58 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 7:13 pm
One of the most important of those was the precedent set in the 2000 case of Brooks v. [read post]
