Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 41 - 60 of 48,936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2012, 10:07 pm by Simon Gibbs
The case of Citation plc v Ellis Whittam Ltd [2012] EWHC 764 (QB) raises an interesting issue as to pre-proceedings costs. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 11:20 pm by Simon Gibbs
The decision of Senior Costs Judge Gordon-Saker in Kenton v Slee Blackwell PLC [2023] EWHC 2613 (SCCO) is another warning as to the dangers of failing to give proper costs estimates. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:44 pm by Simon Gibbs
  In W Portsmouth and Company Ltd v Lowin [2017] EWCA Civ 2172, the Court ruled that the £,1500 cap on the costs of provisional assessment continues to apply even where a party has succeeded on a Part […] The post Cap on costs of provisional assessment appeared first on GWS Law. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 11:30 pm by Simon Gibbs
The indemnity principle does not apply in relation to fixed recoverable costs (as per Butt v Nizami [2006] EWHC 159 (QB)). [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am by Keith Szeliga and Daniel Alvarado
”[2] The Government must perform cost analysis analysis when cost or pricing data are required and may perform cost analysis to evaluate information other than cost or pricing data when it is not possible to determine a fair and reasonable price through price analysis alone.[3] Cost analysis is frequently performed, and the Cost Principles frequently apply, in pricing both fixed-price and cost-reimbursement contracts. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:16 pm by Simon Gibbs
When the Court of Appeal handed down judgment, on 12 October 2011, in Motto & Others v Trafigura [2011] EWCA Civ 1150, ruling that funding costs are not recoverable, I raised the question as to how long we would have to wait before bills of costs stopped claiming for such work? [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:32 pm by Simon Gibbs
Hot on the heels of Master Gordon-Saker’s proportionality decision in BNM v MGN Limited [2016] EWHC B13 (Costs) is another decision from the Senior Courts Costs Office, this time from Master Rowley in Dr Brian May v Wavell Group Plc. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 1:29 pm by emagraken
In today’s case (Harvey v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 7:22 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On appeal from: [2012] EWCA Civ 61 This is a costs judgment arising from Marley v Rawlings & Anor [2014] UKSC 2. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:49 pm by Keith Szeliga and Emily Theriault
Summer is here and we’re back with another edition of the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing requirements that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:04 am by John McFarland
Our firm hosted its 4th land and mineral owner seminar last Friday, and I spoke on deductability of post-production costs from lease royalties in light of the Texas Supreme Court’s decision last year in Chesapeake v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 11:05 pm by Simon Gibbs
In the recent case of CIP Properties (AIPT) Ltd v Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd & Ors (Costs No. 2) [2015] EWHC 481 (TCC), Coulson J was dismissive of the suggestion a defendant might try to submit a knowingly low costs … Continue reading → [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:06 pm by Simon Gibbs
I have already written about the case of Marbrow v Sharpes Garden Services Ltd [2020] EWHC B26 (Costs) (10 July 2020) where the Senior Costs Judge Master Gordon-Saker declined the Claimant’s invitation to award pre-judgment interest on costs. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 9:31 pm by Simon Gibbs
Back in June, reporting in the Solicitors Journal on Master Hurst’s preliminary ruling on proportionality in Motto v Trafigura Ltd [2011] EWHC 90201 (Costs), I started by paraphrasing Humpty Dumpty: “proportionality means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less” It will be recalled that Master Hurst had relied on Morland J’s judgment in Giambrone v JMC Holidays [2002] EWHC 2932 (QB): “For my part I do not accept that if… [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:35 am
In the case of Research in Motion UK Ltd v Visto Corporation [2008] EWHC 3026 (Pat) he stated:"the traditional approach to costs control of litigation in this country, which is after the event by way of an assessment of costs which limits the amount that can be recovered by the receiving party from the paying party, is inadequate and unsatisfactory. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 3:30 am by Christopher Slobogin
Continue reading "The Costs of Privacy"The post The Costs of Privacy appeared first on Jotwell. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 6:46 am by Simon Gibbs
But none of this needs a rule as per Henderson v Henderson that a failure to raise a point before the trial judge will preclude the raising of a point before the costs judge. [read post]