Search for: "Costello v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
The freedom of autonomous communication was implied into Article 40.3.1 as a response to a narrow approach to Article 40.6.1(i) (see Paperlink (above) [31] (Costello J)), but that narrow approach has been superseded by Murphy v IRTC). [read post]
On the 3rd October 2017, Ms Justice Costello delivered her judgement on behalf of the Irish High Court in the case of The Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland and Maximilian Schrems (referred to by some as “Schrems II”). [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Alfano v Costello, 294 F3d 365, the court explained that the alleged misconduct shown "must be severe or pervasive enough to create an objectively hostile or abusive work environment and the victim must also subjectively perceive that environment to be abusive. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Alfano v Costello, 294 F3d 365, the court explained that the alleged misconduct shown "must be severe or pervasive enough to create an objectively hostile or abusive work environment and the victim must also subjectively perceive that environment to be abusive. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Supreme Court in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:03 am by danny
Second, while Wikimedia, and before that EFF’s clients in Jewel v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm by Blog Editorial
The Supreme Court has announced hand down of judgment of the following linked cases, heard 26 – 28 October 2010: Sienkiewicz (Administratrix of the Estate of Enid Costello Deceased) v Greif (UK) Limited here are the case details; and Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council  v Willmore here are the case details. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am by Matthew Flinn
As a matter of general principle, the engagement of a right under the ECHR requires that an interference crosses a minimum threshold of seriousness (see Costello-Roberts v United Kingdom (1995) 19 EHRR 112 at [36]). [read post]