Search for: "County of Marin v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2022, 3:13 pm
Superior Court of California, County of Marin, 495 U.S. 604 (1990), the United States Supreme Court held that in-state service was, by itself, sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
Sea Food Peddler Restaurant, a small claims court action filed in Marin County Superior Court. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
County of Marin (2004) 125 Cal.App.4th 1098). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:38 am
Tamara M., CIV1003042 (all in Marin Superior Court) Three other cases that are close but factually distinguishable: * Townson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
In a decision filed December 2, and later ordered published on December 30, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Mendocino County Superior Court’s judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging a Nonindustrial Timber Management Plan (NTMP) for 615 acres adjacent to Gualala. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 7:52 pm
Monmouth County Assignment Judge Lawrence M. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
We also conclude that the Sonoma County Superior Court improperly imposed restitution and parole revocation fines that were different from those imposed earlier in the three Sonoma County cases. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 6:42 am
” In the motion filed Tuesday in Superior Court in Marin County, California, EFF explains that courts have long recognized that attempts to unmask anonymous speakers not only harm the speakers’ First Amendment rights, but can chill the speech of others who may want to do the same but fear being unmasked. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The EIR related to general planning and conservation steps resulting from Los Angeles County’s prior approval of a 12,000 acre specific plan and neighboring 1500 acre conservation area in Ventura County. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
(A139222; 230 Cal.App.4th 85; Marin County Superior Court; CV1103591, CV1103605.) [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
Before his appointment to the Supreme Court in 2002, Justice Ryan served on the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, for more than five years and as a Judge of the Arizona Superior Court in Maricopa County for more than 10 years. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:18 am
In October 2013, the Marin County Superior Court entered a judgment dissolving the marriage, but left pending the state court action for purposes of issuing further orders regarding child custody, child support and spousal support. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 9:12 am
UnumProvident Corp., Marin County Superior Court, Jan. 23, 2003, Case No. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
The Policy established a number of principles to limit surface water diversions and maintain instream flows in coastal streams in Marin and Sonoma Counties, and parts of Mendocino, Humboldt and Napa Counties, in order to protect native fish populations and habitat. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
The Policy established a number of principles to limit surface water diversions and maintain instream flows in coastal streams in Marin and Sonoma Counties, and parts of Mendocino, Humboldt and Napa Counties, in order to protect native fish populations and habitat. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Superior Court (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1006:Under the Elections Code, a city council facing a qualifying citizen sponsored land use initiative measure is precluded from direct adoption of the measure without first complying with CEQA. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
(A139222; 230 Cal.App.4th 85; Marin County Superior Court; CV1103591, CV1103605.) [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
County of Marin (2004) 125 Cal.App.4th 1098). [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
County of Marin (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 209, which upheld Marin County’s similar ordinance finding, inter alia, that “[a]lthough ordinances are always ‘legislative’ in character, they may also constitute ‘regulations’. [read post]
