Search for: "Court Stacks"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,353
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2019, 5:20 am
., Dissenting), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that new stacking waivers are required whenever an insured increases the UM or UIM coverage on an existing policy.Since the carrier did not secure a new waiver of stacking form from the insured in this case, the insured was entitled to receive stacked UIM coverage following an accident.Anyone wishing to review Justice Wecht's Majority Opinion may click this LINK.Chief Justice Saylor's Dissenting… [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:05 pm
Policyholders should continue to assert that limits can be stacked in situations where there is continuing damage, despite the California Court of Appeals’ latest decision in Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
The federal court reviewed the stacking issue under the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Craley v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 8:47 am
The court reviewed the issue under arguments involving inter-policy stacking and intra-policy stacking. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
As such, the Superior Court the court affirmed the lower court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the carrier in this declaratory judgment action on the stacking issue. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:50 am
Stack the Supreme Court? [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 12:00 am
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court held that, under Sackett I, 75 Pa.C.S.A. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 5:30 am
She waived stacking on the UIM coverage limits. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
The Court also analyzed the general negligence claim asserted by plaintiff. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
Since no additional vehicle was added to the policy, the Shipp court found that there was no change to the potential stacked UM/UIM coverage that was available under the policy ($200,000.00 stacked, $100,000.00 unstacked). [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 6:56 am
The PA Supreme Court said yes! [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
.), the trial court addressed the issue of the statutory requirement that a first named insured sign a rejection of stacking form in an underinsured motorist context in order for the rejection to be upheld.According to the Opinion, in this matter, the wife of the first named insured signed the rejection of stacking form.Thereafter, the wife was involved in a car accident and made claim for stacked UIM coverage, which Penn National denied.The wife claimed that the… [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 5:45 pm
Section 1738(c) requires a new stacking waiver whenever the stacked amount of UIM coverage changes — regardless of whether the change is an increase or decrease in the amount of stacked coverage. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:07 pm
A woman is suing Wal-Mart Stores for negligence in a store accident that resulted in a stack of tables falling on her arm. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:13 am
Sullivan, on a members panel stacking. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:13 am
Although the insurer argued the trial court was wrong to rely on its “excess coverage provision” in finding the entire anti-stacking provision unenforceable, the state supreme court disagreed. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Petrie decision was important because, under its holding, waivers of stacking only applied to intra-policy issues and stacking issues and not to inter-policy stacking issues. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 7:29 am
Standard Fire Insurance, reviewed recently by the South Carolina Supreme Court, the difference between stacked and non-stacked coverage meant $750,000 more in pay-outs following a devastating car accident. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:23 pm
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company holding in that case that the insured could not stack and that the UIM anti-stacking language was not ambiguous. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 5:00 am
The Court ultimately ruled that, since stacking was not rejected in writing under the Donegal policy, then stacking applied.Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney James Stinsman of the Levin Firm in Philadelphia. [read post]
