Search for: "Courts v. Smart"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,215
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 9:12 am
The fact that a trade mark might be – even primarily – understood as a promotional formula, does not mean that it cannot be perceived as an indication of origin (CJEU, Smart Technologies v OHIM, C-311/11 P, at para. 30). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:59 pm
Consultants, Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm
State of New York et al v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm
State of New York et al v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
New York Rifle and Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am
The Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal in the case of Wright v McCormack [2023] EWCA Civ 892. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s landmark 2018 decision Ohio v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:33 pm
by Dennis Crouch In Roku, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:32 pm
Their commentary is funny, smart, salty, and really helps listeners understand the cases and court decisions. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 9:02 am
Justin is co-lead plaintiff in a first-of-its-kind class-action lawsuit, Justin v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 3:08 am
Louis Status: Briefed, Argued and Awaiting Decision On December 6, 2023, the Court heard oral argument in Muldrow v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court had just decided Kelo v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
Last month in the courts On Monday 18 December 2023, there were applications in the case of KB-2023-001023 Piepenbrock v Michell and others before Tipples J. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm
.), in today's Hermes Int'l v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 2:10 pm
Ramey & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 6:38 am
Leytrick v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:19 am
Ltd. v Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:19 am
Ltd. v Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
Which in turn would have meant that I'd have written a solo dissent, since the California Supreme Court unanimously comes out the other way.Except for one thing. [read post]
