Search for: "Cowards v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2025, 2:28 am by INFORRM
Summary judgment test The judge started out by repeating the explanation of the summary judgment test/principles set out in Easyair Ltd v Opal [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch), which states that: each claim must have a realistic rather than a fanciful prospect of success; a realistic claim is one that is “more than merely arguable”; and that in reaching its findings, the court must not conduct a “mini-trial”. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
“In 1989, this Court considered a claim against the State in Sweeney v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
  Have you read the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
  Have you read the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:41 am by Brian A. Comer
Peoples Baking Co., 205 S.C. 149, 31 S.E.2d 154 (1944) (piece of steel in piece of cake); Coward v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
”  Fourteen other states have a similar rule. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
”  Fourteen other states have a similar rule. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:45 am
Lucy has the exciting details.In other news, the Law Society Gazette reports the comments of the Master of the Rolls Lord Neuberger in the Ambrosiadou v Coward case last week, that court hearings should not be private. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
The court excluded a number of other items that the State sought to introduce.People v. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 10:41 pm by Jeff Gamso
Some Poor Fuckup or United States of America v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:39 am
And in the United States, of course, you're allowed to publish true information, even if it hurts someone. [read post]