Search for: "Craighead v. State" Results 41 - 44 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
” The judges of the Court of Session have said this “In McDonald v HM Advocate Lord Hope of Craighead held that a decision by the High Court of Justiciary not to entertain and determine a devolution issue that had been intimated to it could be treated as a “determination” of the issue for the purposes of paragraph 13 of Schedule 6 to the Scotland Act 1998;  this might be thought a somewhat Jesuitical position. [read post]
  Lord Hope of Craighead, in turn, granted a highly unusual interview to The Times rejecting these criticisms (‘Salmond has got it all wrong, says judge – First Minister “misunderstood the law and the facts”’, 27 May 2011). [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am by CMS
This is outwith the competence of the Scottish Parliament. 1453: The Advocate General states that the Scottish Parliament cannot proceed on basis that it will amend its legislation in future if it needs to. [read post]