Search for: "Creed v. Creed" Results 41 - 60 of 434
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2022, 12:16 pm by MEL
Published in Canadian HR Reporter A new landmark decision from an Ontario Arbitrator, Public Health Sudbury & Districts v Ontario Nurses’ Association, found that Public Health Sudbury and Districts (“PHSD”) breached the Ontario Human Rights Code (“Code”) when it terminated an employee who refused to comply with the employer’s vaccination policy on the basis of a protected human rights ground, being the employee’s creed. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: The Kentucky Supreme Court’s 2012 decision in Gingerich v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Perhaps the best starting point for analysis of the compelled-speech realm remains Wooley v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 10:01 am by Bonnie Snyder
His first principle — "no compelled speech, thought, or belief" — reminds us of the important precedent set by West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 7:14 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
However, mere political opinion does not engage creed. [read post]