Search for: "Cross v. Facebook, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 313
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
Quebecor Media Inc. et al, 2022 ONSC 3749. [read post]
28 May 2022, 6:47 am by Eric Goldman
Craigslist * Facebook Loses Jurisdictional Ruling in Texas Sex Trafficking Lawsuit–Facebook v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday 12 April 2022, there were hearings in the cases of BW Legal Services Limited v Glassdoor, Inc before Jay J; Dudley v Phillips before Saini J, and; XXX v Persons Unknown before Chamberlain J. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
The application to dismiss a defamation claim as a Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation (SLAPP) under s.4 of the Protection of Public Participation Act 2019 was dismissed in Waterton Global Resource Management, Inc. v Bockhold, 2022 BCSC 499 (CanLII). [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 18 February 2022, judgement was given in favour of the claimants in the defamation claim Thunder Studios Inc (California) v Kazal (No 12) [2022] FCA 110. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Gutman operated several Hayley Paige-themed accounts before her employment (on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn) and five accounts during her employment with JLM (on Pinterest, Instagram, Snapchat, Spotify, and TikTok). [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
On 21 December 2021, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Soriano v Forensic News LLC & ors [2021] EWCA Civ 1952, allowing the Claimant’s cross-appeal to serve out his data protection claim against the US-based defendant news organisation and journalists. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm by Eric Goldman
The plaintiffs got three free bites at the apple before the fourth crossed over the line; and it mattered that the copyright work at issue here–stickers for car consoles–is so clearly subject to minimal or no copyright protection that no one realistically should have thought the sticker design was copyrightable, despite the registrant’s earlier settlement with the second comer. [read post]