Search for: "Cross v. Powers"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,808
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2016, 1:47 pm
By Jason Rantanen Power Integrations, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:28 pm
Preemption v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
Pennsylvania law first rejected cross-jurisdictional tolling in an accountant malpractice case, Ravitch v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 7:53 am
Cross Match argues that the question is largely answered by Young Eng’rs, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:18 am
The FPF Report mentions that the EDPB recommends the harmonization of procedural aspects of GDPR enforcement, with a focus on “the (i) status and rights of the parties to the administrative procedures, (ii) procedural deadlines, (iii) requirements for admissibility or dismissal of complaints, (iv) investigative powers of SAs, and (v) the overall implementation of the cooperation procedure”. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 5:45 am
Here are the materials in Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:38 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 1:42 pm
Some readers may remember my post from last May at the old WaPo site about the Second Circuit briefs filed in Marsh v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:12 am
The post Unusual Cross-Ideological Agreement in Tyler v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:09 am
The family pointed to a 1971 case, Bivens v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Morrison (2000) and United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:53 pm
Pereira Last week, a bi-partisan coalition of political groups and the federal government completed briefing cross motions for summary judgment in American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 5:14 am
And in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
Limits on powers v safeguards The Act is underpinned by the assumption that breadth of powers can be counterbalanced by safeguards (independent prior approval, access restrictions, oversight) and soft limits on their exercise (necessity and proportionality). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 9:34 am
A recent Texas Supreme Court decision on pipeline eminent domain, Hlavinka v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
Many would say that officially mandated lists of what we have been reading, be that paper books or websites, cross a red line. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:29 pm
In Oliphant v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 8:29 am
I wrote this blog for TPMCafe's book salon and am cross-posting it here.)Several people in the comments section yesterday questioned my contention that presidential power is not a partisan issue because future Democratic presidents will enjoy the same enhanced authorities that the Bush-Cheney administration has pioneered. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:47 am
In Timmons v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:10 pm
Raich ruled that Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce gives it the power to ban possession of medical marijuana that had never crossed state lines or been sold in any market anywhere. [read post]
