Search for: "Cunningham v. California"
Results 41 - 60
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2008, 9:19 pm
People v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 5:42 pm
People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:55 pm
Like Mark posted, in a 6-3 ruling yesterday, SCOTUS rejected California's 30 year-old sentencing law. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 7:21 pm
People v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 6:21 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 4:44 pm
The core of her holding in Cunningham, however, is that the California Supreme Court misinterpreted California's sentencing laws. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 11:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a ruling in People.ai, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 11:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a ruling in People.ai, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 5:32 pm
California, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 4:59 am
This court has held its guarantees extend to lawyers (Cunningham v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 12:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:12 pm
People v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:41 pm
The defendant initially got 27 months, then was resentenced to 21 months after Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:50 pm
Supreme Court's opinion in Cunningham. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
United States, No. 06-5618 (cert. granted, Nov. 3, 2006); and Rita v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 10:59 am
The "Daily Journal" has Frank Zotter's Judicial Follies: Brief and to the Point, citing a number of amusing California appellate opinions (e.g., Stephens, Partain & Cunningham v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 11:43 am
Last year in Cunningham v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
California (2007) 549 U.S.__ [127 S.Ct. 856] (Cunningham), compelling reduction of the sentence to the midterm. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 5:54 am
[Posted by Ron Wright] The Cunningham case settled the applicability of Blakely to the largest "hold-out" state, California. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 7:50 am
Though much can be said about the substance of the arguments--particularly Cunningham v. [read post]