Search for: "Custody and Parenting of B C B W" Results 41 - 60 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2015, 3:25 pm by Steven Hansen
(e)(f) (1) Except as provided in subdivision (d) (e), a violation of this section is an infraction punishable by a fine of not more than twenty-five dollars ($25).(2) The parent or legal guardian having control or custody of an unemancipated minor whose conduct violates this section shall be jointly and severally liable with the minor for the amount of the fine imposed pursuant to this subdivision. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Despite the agency's diligent efforts, the father failed to avail himself of the various resources necessary for reunification (see, Social Services Law § 384-b[7][c]; Matter of Reggie B., 223 A.D.2d 471, 636 N.Y.S.2d 790; Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Despite the agency’s diligent efforts, the father failed to avail himself of the various resources necessary for reunification (see, Social Services Law § 384-b[7][c]; Matter of Reggie B., 223 A.D.2d 471, 636 N.Y.S.2d 790; Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:42 am by Joel R. Brandes
Specifically, the Family Court judge indicated that "[w]hat concerns me is, apparently, there is no neglect proceeding in the State of New Mexico. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
While Mother shall be the custodial parent with sole and final decision-making, this does not end the analysis. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 4:03 pm by Steven Hansen
(f)(1)Except as provided in subdivision (e), a violation of this section is an infraction punishable by a fine of not more than twenty-five dollars ($25).(2)The parent or legal guardian having control or custody of an unemancipated minor whose conduct violates this section shall be jointly and severally liable with the minor for the amount of the fine imposed pursuant to this subdivision. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/609.2(b) Is The Move Even Far Enough To Qualify As A Relocation? [read post]