Search for: "D and S Family Preservation Trust v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2016, 10:25 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Tragically, since 2000, an average of approximately 55 police officers have been shot and killed each year in the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In other words, it is déjà vu all over again, and boards should not wait to act until after the world experiences the cyber-era equivalent of the 1929 stock market crash or the 2002 Enron collapse. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
 And finally Eleonora updated on the CJEU's decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment where the CJEU said that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive, but Member States can protect them: "[The Information Society] [D]irective provides that broadcasting organizations may prohibit the provision to the public fixations of their broadcasts [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Originally grew out of access to medicine, and that really is about patents/R&D. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Ken White
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the motion. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:29 am by Ana
  Without the legal protections afforded to their married counterparts, common law spouses had no other means for asserting a family property claim other than the equitable principles of constructive trust and the claim to an interest in a joint family venture ushered in by Pettkus v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm by Law Lady
BOYNTON-JCP ASSOCIATES, LTD., d/b/a BOYNTON BEACH MALL and SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., Appellee. 4th District.Child custody -- Time sharing -- Order modifying parenting plan to suspend mother's time-sharing during father's week to remedy her noncompliance with previous parenting plan is reversed because it fails to reflect that the change is temporary as the oral pronouncement held -- Remand for clarification that remedial custody arrangement is temporary -- Attorney's fees -- Trial court… [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Constitutional Right to Seek an Abortion: From Roe to Casey Before the Supreme Court’s 1973 ruling in Roe v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm by Gregory Forman
United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit concluded that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) violates equal protection and is therefore unconstitutional. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am by Mandelman
  In no way would I ever jeopardize our familys home to save $104.27, that is, the difference between the amount paid and what was apparently the amount owed. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
United StatesDocket: 11-94Issue(s): Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendment principles that this Court established in Apprendi v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
Department of Children And Families ,(Fla.App. 4 Dist.)Government - Agency was not required to pay any fees for establishment of special needs pooled trust for developmentally disabled teenager.In a matter of first impression, the District Court of Appeal of Florida has held that the Department of Children and Families, as trustee of a master trust into which a developmentally disabled teenager's Social Security disability benefits were paid, was not… [read post]