Search for: "D. BRINKER" Results 41 - 60 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2011, 4:36 pm by Matt C. Bailey
I have spent the better part of the morning reviewing and digesting oral argument in Brinker. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Last week we filed a supplemental brief under Rule of Court 8.520(d)(1) to address the impact of Martinez v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:15 am by Andrew Frisch
Plaintiffs agree that no one from Brinker supervised, trained or directed them; no Brinker employees were even present when Plaintiffs worked. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:45 pm by Matt C. Bailey
As the district court pointed out in its certification ruling, “[d]efendant’s future compliance with the law may be more valuable to the class than the present claims for back pay. [read post]
20 May 2010, 10:15 am by Steven G. Pearl
The California Supreme Court has issued the most important wage and hour case of 2010, and it is not Brinker v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:22 pm by Angel Reyes
Norman Brinker always reminded me: Begin with the end in mind. [read post]