Search for: "D. H. v. State of Alabama"
Results 41 - 60
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2018, 10:11 pm
-Dallas May 3, 2018, no pet. h.) [read post]
2 Sep 2006, 9:53 pm
The Alabama Supreme Court in Ex Parte Fredrick D. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
Alabama, 14-8189, and Lockhart v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:39 am
Supported by 13 other states as amici, Alabama argues that the 11th Circuit erred under AEDPA by too readily attributing error to the state court. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
§ 1212.7(d). [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 10:05 am
Finding the case to be controlled by State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:18 pm
Marion County, upholding a stringent state voter ID law, and Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. (1977) (State's "burden" is to "establis[h] that the same decision would have resulted" (emphasis added)). [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:02 am
Barcal applied comment k, 2016 WL 1086028, at *3, because Alabama is a well-recognized across the board state. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 8:09 pm
V., Margolis, H. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
Rev. 433 (2012); H. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 1:33 pm
John H. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
. prices" in another state, and thus "deprive[d] businesses and consumers in other States of 'whatever competitive advantages they may possess' based on the conditions of the local market. [read post]
31 May 2013, 1:47 pm
For more on Dockery v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Fifth Circuit United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
(United States v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Super. 1989), aff'd, 583 A.2d 789 (Pa. 1991); Kalinowski v. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:52 pm
" State v. [read post]
