Search for: "D. J. Williams" Results 41 - 60 of 2,849
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Kim Isaac Eisler, The Last Liberal:  Justice William J. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That is the way it would remain until the NAACP flexed its political muscle to defeat Hoover’s nomination of John J. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:05 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
About a week before, she’d canceled several shows due to experiencing flu-like symptoms. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
You could, for instance, turn your gaze on the court itself, and give it one long, hard stare.Sutherland was celebrating--and, sadly, wildly overstating--changes he’d had a real hand in, as had his wife, Rosamond Lee Sutherland. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Again, we have come to bury Cuba's Caribbean Marxism, not to praise it (William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar Act III, scene II). [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post,  The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).William J. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
The parties agreed to not use the term “oligarch” in the proceedings.[29] From the 38 works Rybolovlev bought through Bouvier, 12 were arranged with assistance from Sotheby’s to Bouvier, and only four of those were at issue in trial.[30] These four include Leonardo da Vinci’s Salvador Mundi, Modigliani’s Tete, Klimt’s Wasserschlangen II, and Magritte’s Domaine d’Arnheim. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Bruen, 597 U.S. 1, 36–37 (2022) (Thomas, J., for the majority of the Court); Bostock v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
  Moreover, even if Colorado’s intent were to try to impose a condition on Trump’s service, obviously that condition would be that he not be Section-3-disqualified to serve on January 20, 2025, rather than that (as Mitchell would have it) that he’d be disqualified from taking office as of March 5, 2024 (the date of the Colorado primary). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:24 am by Joshua Matz
Nothing in the Constitution—or in the Senate rules—requires that every impeachment trial involve full-blown proceedings of the sort that occurred during the recent trials of former President Donald J. [read post]