Search for: "D. STROUD"
Results 41 - 53
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2008, 1:37 pm
Sarhan filed it pro se), but not many could articulate exactly why, as a matter of jurisdictional jurisprudence, you'd get laughed out of court for pulling a prank like this. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm
App. 563, 571 (2014) (Stroud, J., dissenting) (arguing for explicit recognition of defense and noting that several North Carolina decisions have relied on the test for the defense, “although only assuming arguendo that it would apply because the facts in those cases did not satisfy the test”), aff’d per curiam, 367 N.C. 771 (2015). [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
Judge Stroud dissented from the majority’s resolution of the constitutional issue, expressing her view that the trial court made findings of fact sufficient to permit appellate review and that it correctly addressed the three prongs of the balancing test. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
., Case No. 1:16-cv-00341-JFB-SRF (D. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
., Case No. 1:16-cv-00341-JFB-SRF (D. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:14 am
This post summarizes published criminal cases issued by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on June 16, 2020. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm
Section 117 provides as follows: (1) Subject to subsection (2), subsection 70NFB(1) and sections 117AA, 117AB, 117AC and 118, each party to proceedings under this Act shall bear his or her own costs. (2) If, in proceedings under this Act, the court is of opinion that there are circumstances that justify it in doing so, the court may, subject to subsections (2A), (4) and (5) and the applicable Rules of Court, make such order as to costs and security for costs,… [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
UPDATE (Oct. 26, 2010; 11:30 a.m.): This post has been modified to include petitions that have been re-listed for the Conference of October 29. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 6:52 am
Bartlesville, OK 74006 Strike, Jane Fletcher 19 Meadow Ridge Loop Maumelle, AR 72113 Stroud, Kelvin Paul 107 Watson St. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:51 pm
"11.2.According to stroud's Judicial dictionary acknowledgement means as under:(1),"an acknowledgement, in writing of a debt......so as to take such debt out of the Limitation Act.....(1) must admit that debt is due, and (2) promise, or justify the inference of promise, of payment unconditionally, or (if conditionally) it must be shown that the condition has been accomplished.... [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:05 am
This post summarizes the published criminal opinions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on June 4, 2024. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
CIVIL CONSPIRACY DOES NOT HAVE ITS OWN SOL - TAKES IT FROM THE UNDERLYING TORT The Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code (CPRC) specifies the limitations period for a number of different categories of claims, but civil conspiracy is not one of them. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
STROUD, Judge. [read post]
