Search for: "D.J.2" Results 41 - 60 of 250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2012, 3:59 pm by Jon Sands
Uribe, No. 11-55187 (6-22-12) (Marbley, D.J., with Kleinfeld and M. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 8:58 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Lynch, Droney and Reiss [D.J.]) says that plaintiffs did not plausibly plead that Esposito deliberately ignored facts that justified the marchers' takeover of the roadway. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:08 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
No. 103, slip op. at 2–3 (Apr. 26, 2013) (holding that reporting policy of unknown visitors in parking lot was lawful where rule was an employee safety policy). [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 8:17 am
A corporate officer will be found jointly and severally liable with his corporation for copyright infringement if he (1) had the right and ability to supervise the infringing activity, and (2) has a direct financial interest in such activities. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 8:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"The record contained evidence that at the time of her demotion and discharge, Arience employees commented that: (1) Bar-Tur would be able to attend to her 'little doctor's appointments' now that she was relieved of certain responsibilities; (2) the demotion was 'supposed to be a personal opportunity for [Bar-Tur] to take care of some important things in [her] life'; and (3) Arience wanted to give Bar-Tur 'space to work through [her] health… [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 6:01 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
To prevail in a public employee speech claim, the plaintiff must show (1) he spoke on a matter of public importance and (2) he spoke out as a citizen and not as an employee. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Katzmann, Winter and Marrero [D.J.]) will have none of this. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 7:16 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The jury had two sets of claims before it: (1) implied contract arising from the County's EEO policy, which prohibited discrimination and (2) federal and state antidiscrimination statutory violations, including Title VII. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff identifies two racist comments allegedly made by the school principal: (1) "students should have teachers that look like them," and (2) "white teachers could not, are not competent to teach our students. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 3:28 pm
For publication opinions today (0): NFP civil opinions today (2): Invol. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is important for plaintiff because, as the Court of Appeals (Lynch, Cabranes and Matsumoto D.J.] points out, plaintiff may have a claim arising from her brief pregnancy-related termination, but the damages arising from that claim may be slight.Plaintiff claims constructive discharge in violation of Title VII because management made her working conditions so horrible that she had no choice but to resign. [read post]