Search for: "DB v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
The candidate's appeal to the Disciplinary Board (DB) included the Main Request to the DB "to instruct the Examination Board to remark my Paper B".A remittal to the Examination Board (EB) by the DB requires the decision of the EB to have been based on a "serious and obvious mistake" (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, V 2.6.3). [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:00 pm
Premier League v BT, UEFA v BT, Matchroom v BT and Queensberry v BT). [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 3:12 pm by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
DB Investments, Inc., 667 F.3d 273, 308 (3d Cir. 2011), which held that state law variations do not matter for settlements since no trial will commence. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The prospect of being labelled a ‘criminal’ by the State can frequently be as great a source of consternation as the punishment itself. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:29 am
After some research in the matter, we believe a tie is not a loss, and Memon, survives another week.See, Bushel’s Case (1670) 124 E.R.1006; Bushel's case;  and Entick v Carrington [1765] 19 Howell's State Trials 1030. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has analysed the case of DB v GMC [2018] EWCA Civ 1497, a case which illustrates best practice in managing mixed personal data. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am by Richard Hunt
Castro et al,  2:16-CV-00658-MCE-DB, 2018 WL 2329249, at *3 (E.D. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:27 am by Jessica Kroeze
The Opponents had raised objections on the grounds of Articles 100(a) and (b) EPC.The evidence cited during the opposition procedure includesD1: WO 2007/087243 A2;D2: WO 2004/041982 A1;D3: EP 1 867 708 A1;D4: V. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This generalization is true not just for companies in the United States but for all companies around the world. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:06 am by LEANNE WOODS, 1 CROWN OFFICE ROW
Unfortunately for the Police Service of Northern Ireland (‘PSNI’), the Supreme Court found in DB v Chief Constable of PSNI [2017] UKSC 7 that the Force had made both the law and its life, in policing parades in Belfast, more complicated than it needed to be. [read post]