Search for: "DEFENDER SERVICES v. COOPER"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
The bill would authorize a worker cooperative company to engage in any lawful business activity, except as specified, but would prohibit construing the act to permit a worker cooperative company to render professional services, as defined. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 10:07 am
Facts: This case (Reynolds v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
STATE V. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:41 am
Cooper), April 30, 2010: In this case, the defendant is a comedian of African-American and Swedish descent. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:00 am
The style of this case is Garry Jenkins v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
The following day, Defendant’s counsel and STATE V. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Dept. of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978) (overruling holding of Monroe v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:56 am
The defendant then sought to have the order set aside on the grounds that the court had no jurisdiction to permit service of the order on the defendant out of the jurisdiction. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 9:09 pm
On 4/2/2012, Plaintiff filed a Certificate of Service indicating that he served the Motion on Defendant. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 5:42 am
In Cooper v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:54 am
The Supreme Court held in Brady v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
Mathis v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 8:46 am
In Quark Fishing Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:34 pm
OCEAN PLACE AT SILVER BEACH ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida Not for Profit Corporation; and FPR FORCE, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Appellees. 4th District.Civil procedure -- Relief from judgment -- Service of process -- Non-residents -- Defects -- Substitute service on Michigan-based defendant through the Florida Secretary of State under section 48.181(1) was insufficient where defendant provided sworn unrefuted testimony that he was not conducting… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
We know that service by email on a defendant’s US lawyer is permissible as a form of alternate service of process, because it does not involve transmission of a document abroad (Dyer v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 11:29 am
Tex. 1990), aff'd sub. nom., U.S. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
But “honest services” is open-‐‑ended, and in Skilling v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
Div. 1995) (holding that defendants could be personally liable for alleged conversion even if they were acting in corporate capacity); Van Dam Egg Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 10:04 am
Catch Curve, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:08 am
Datascape, Inc. v. [read post]
