Search for: "DEFENSE LAWYERS v. Kaye" Results 41 - 60 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2010, 5:00 am by Steve McConnell
(We once saw a criminal defense lawyer try to use the "trout in the milk" image to argue why there was inadequate evidence that his client was running a mail fraud scheme. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:06 am
- Inter-Continental Hotels Corporation, Six Continents Hotels, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law)   United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica)     US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court agrees to hear Bilski case: decision to have broad implications for Silicon Valley companies (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Summary judgment based on licensing defense: Accolade Systems v Citrix Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Summary judgment of noninfringement granted: Fenner v Microsoft (EDTexweblog.com) USPTO initially rejects 41… [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica)     US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court agrees to hear Bilski case: decision to have broad implications for Silicon Valley companies (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Summary judgment based on licensing defense: Accolade Systems v Citrix Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Summary judgment of noninfringement granted: Fenner v Microsoft (EDTexweblog.com) USPTO initially rejects 41… [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:00 am
(At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) Section 230 immunity: Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP)   Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property)   Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda)   Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46)   Russia Video… [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 1:48 pm
(ZDNet - A Developer's View) CLIPARAMA.com launches world's biggest video only search (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) Details released on the Radiohead experiment results: a tremendous success (Techdirt) Disney EULA funny, but also a bit sad (Innovationpartners)   Canada Canada Election 2008 - a digital policy scorecard (Michael Geist)   Europe European Court of Justice rules database owners can prevent material from being transferred from their… [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:07 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) Conference on creative content online: What financial models for creative content online? [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 11:36 am
Nor, writes Smith, is this the first defense verdict in Marshall this year - in April, in Sofpool v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 2:21 pm
He was looking for a moral response devoid of legalisms, but alas, lawyers being lawyers, defense counsel couldn't say, "Of course that's wrong! [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
Even so, Aronoff's approach hasn't been widely adopted by the defense bar. [read post]
17 May 2007, 8:00 am
The fact that the assigned lawyers don't have the pay incentives to care in many instances in civil and criminal cases is not a reason to reject civil Gideon, but a reason to increase the minimum pay of assigned counsel (as occurred in New York for criminal defense attorneys after this problem was publicized through the efforts of Chief Judge Judith Kaye). [read post]